The restaurant is flexible and on two levels. The lower is smaller and allows for more intimate dining, whilst the flexibility of the upper area is such that there is no problem accommodating family groups of fifteen or so people. Given the disparity in guests there is a case to be made here for the lower restaurant to be developed into something more up market for the spa audience, leaving the upper restaurant for the family diners. The views from the windows are spectacular, but the space itself is imposing with the upper restaurant being quite theatrical in its layout which dates from 1893, and has elements of the arts and crafts movement about its structure. With a Quaker background the hotel was temperance until recent years, but now boasts an award winning wine list. The bar however is one of the weaker areas of design providing an environment that lacks quality.
As with many resort hotels the conundrum here is the variety of guest that the building hosts. Family groups and the environmental buff alike are well served, with features such as the nature trails, bird table etc. being well thought out and well positioned. Whether the conference guest or the spa treatment seeker looking for pampering are as well served is debatable, but the potential to provide a differentiation in service is there within the building. The variety possible within this kind of hotel is well illustrated within the previously reviewed
Merton in Jersey CI where a variety of restaurant from fast food to fine dining is contained within the envelope. The two floor restaurant here has the same potential, but currently it is left to the restaurant staff to decide who goes up and who goes down…